The Ledger, Page 4 Nashville Banner, Monday, July 24, 1995
FROM THE COVER
Few profiting from racial link
Most firms too small to compete
First of two parts
By Jennifer McMillion
Banner Staff Writer
Amid a bitter national debate over the fate of affirmative action
programs, some Mid-state Black leaders say the fuss over reverse
discrimination in contracting is misdirected.
In Tennessee government, they say the problem is not that minority
businesses are profiting unfairly from government preferences, but that
they are hardly profiting at all.
"Ideally, while we would all like to live in a color-blind society, the
stark reality is that we don’t," says Cheri Henderson, director of the
Tennessee Minority Purchasing Council. "We still don’t have parity in
employment - much less procurement."
Less than 2 percent of the money from state purchases and less than 1
percent from Metro last year was awarded to African-American-owned
companies, according to the best records available, which are
incomplete.
"If we’re ever going to close the gap of income levels, we’ve got to do
it through business," says Marilyn Robinson, project director for the
Nashville Minority Business Development Center.
"When will it be our turn? If they look at who’s left out - if they
give this segment an opportunity - it’s going to help everyone."
African-Americans, Tennessee’s largest minority, make up about 16
percent of the population statewide and 23.4 percent of the population
of Davidson County, according to U.S. Census data.
However, they own only 4 percent of businesses in the state, and those
are mostly small, with average receipts well below the national average.
"One of the problems we have with minority businesses is that they
cannot buy in the quantity that would allow them to be competitive with
other, larger businesses," says Melvin Gill, a local architect who is
seeking a City Council seat in District 20.
"When they bid, they’re competing with the same companies they buy supplies from. That’s a no-win situation."
Arthur Overall, owner of Music City Telecom and member of the NAACP
Fair Share Committee, says local government should do more to shepherd
struggling minority firms along.
"As far as I’m concerned, it hasn’t happened for us," Overall says.
"I’ve been in business for 10 years, I work every day to try to make
dollars and stay in business.
"Doors don’t just open up for you because you’re minority. The
perception is that African-Americans are getting all these contracts
because the federal government mandates that X-Y-Z contracts go to
minorities. That’s just not true."
Gov. Don Sundquist’s recent press conference on minority purchasing
raised serious questions about the share of state money actually
awarded to minority-owned companies in Tennessee, where there are no
race-conscious set-aside programs for state contracts.
While Sundquist repeatedly used the figure "less than 1 percent," official records seemed to set it at close to 10 percent.
He endorsed a minority participation goal of 15 percent.
Currently, the state sets an overall goal for small business, but no separate goals for minority or women-owned businesses.
"I’m encouraged that the administration is paying attention to equal opportunity in procurement," Henderson says.
"Sundquist has indicated that everyone in the state deserves an equal
opportunity to compete. So the jury’s out, but I’m encouraged."
Defining ‘minority’
At the heart of the confusion over figures at the governor’s recent
press conference was Tennessee’s official definition of "minority
business."
Currently, 36,307 vendors are registered with the state Department of General Services as small businesses.
Of these, 6,063 are identified as "minority owned." But this term
officially includes women as well as ethnic and religious minorities
considered socially disadvantaged.
The state has never officially broken these figures down according to
gender and ethnicity, but it is required by legislative mandate to
begin the process this month. Some initial tracking of black business
participation has begun already.
The state sets a goal of 25 percent for small business participation.
This year, the small-business share of General Services contracts was
exactly that. "Minority" companies accounted for 9.8 percent of the
total.
However, because the definition of "minority owned" includes women, minority leaders say the number looks inflated.
The statutes of states like Tennessee, which lump together women and
ethnic minorities under one umbrella, can skew perceptions about how
those states compare to others that use "minority owned" to refer to
disadvantaged ethnic minorities.
In fact, of the $247 million in purchases handled through General
Services last year, only $3.5 million - or 1.4 percent- went to those
registered as African-American.
General Services officials say that figure, based on their own data, is
highly misleading. Ethnicity figures are based on self-identification
through questionnaires sent out by state.
Yet only about 14 percent of those registered as minorities indicated
their ethnicity; about half of those were African-American. The real
numbers could be much higher, officials say.
On the other hand, Robinson notes that total minority business in the
state could be lower because so much purchasing activity is not tracked
for minority participation, nor is there any method of verifying
minority-ownership.
Haphazard records
The most commonly cited official state figures for minority contracting
come from the Department of General Services. Yet only a fraction of
all state business is conducted though General Services - about
$247,000 in purchases.
Some other state bodies, including the Department of Transportation,
the Board of Regents and the University of Tennessee, report minority
participation figures to General Services, but these figures are
tracked and calculated separately.
And the Office of Contracts Administration, which processes 2,700
contracts a year with a dollar value of about $1.28 billion, has no
centralized tracking system at all to determine minority participation.
Included in this number are professional services - legal, architectural or consulting services, for example.
Marva Bradford, who was director of contracts until two weeks ago, says a tracking system is currently being discussed.
Some business leaders are angry nothing has been done yet to ensure compliance with federal equal opportunity laws.
"Why would you keep good records when you’re not in compliance?" Overall says. "They know what the deal is."
Comptroller of the Treasury Bill Snodgrass, who is responsible for
auditing the operations of state agencies, responds that there is no
conspiracy to hide information.
"He’s suggesting we’ve set up our purchasing operation to make
obtaining the information difficult," Snodgrass says. "But it’s set up
the best way to purchase goods and services."
Snodgrass concedes, however, that "there (do) need to be efforts made
to obtain the information from these different points of view. I know
there are currently efforts to do that."
A 1994 study of state agencies by Snodgrass’ office found that many
agency officials were not even aware of their responsibilities under
Title VI of 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Title VI requires all state agencies receiving federal money to ensure
that recipients and sub-recipients of the funds are not discriminated
against because of race, color or national origin.
A state law now requires all agencies receiving federal funds to submit
a Title VI implementation plan to the comptroller’s office annually.
And funds have been appropriated to deal with complaints.
Not only does the state have no official numbers on the total amount of
minority participation in contracts, but it requires no certification
process through General Services to establish whether businesses
claiming to be minority really are.
"I’m in favor of a very thorough certification process," says
Henderson, whose organization offers certification to ethnic
minorities. She says such a process is necessary "to weed out false
fronts."
The current verification system requires notarized applications, but no on-site visit or supporting evidence, officials say.
Debra Luter, small and minority business coordinator for General
Services, is the only employee in charge of registering and tracking
minority-owned businesses for that department..
She says she lacks the staff to check up on the more than 6,000 businesses registered as minority.
"There is no on-site confirmation," Luter says. "We accept (the self-identification) at face value."
Currently , only minority-owned businesses seeking contracts involving
federal funding - such as Department of Transportation contracts - must
go through more rigid certification process conducted by the state
Office of Minority Business Enterprise.
"It would be counterproductive for us to make people get certified,"
Elsie Smith, assistant commissioner for purchasing management and
general counsel for General Services.
"They wouldn’t gain anything since we have no set-asides or
quotas....We wouldn’t be able to give them a prize for jumping through
those hoops."
Minority support
General services does have some support programs designed to encourage minority companies to do business with them.
The most formalized is a computer search system designed to favor minority businesses in the procurement process.
General Services staff also meet with minority business representatives
to discuss concerns. They offer special seminars to help familiarize
them with the bid process.
Despite such efforts, a 1994 survey of minority business owners by a governor’s advisory committee reveals lingering concerns.
Some are problems that might be common to all businesses, including slow payment and excessive paperwork.
Others are specific to small or minority businesses, such as inability
to compete with large suppliers or to meet bonding requirements. Many
say they want the state to set specific ethnic goals or to institute a
"true set-aside program."
Please see PARITY, page 5
Parity
Continued from page 4
Currently, the state has no quota system for minority contracts. Race
and gender-based goals and incentive programs exist only with some
contracts involving federal funds.
State officials point out that they cannot legally institute sheltered
competition programs based solely on race because the Supreme Court
ruled in 1989 that such programs are unconstitutional unless they can
pass a "strict scrutiny" test, a standard the court just extended to
federal programs last month.
Wake up call
Robinson says that if changes are going to occur, they will have to come from the top down.
Any good-faith effort, she says, should start with more minority representation in government leadership positions.
"The people in the policy-making positions - none of them look like
us," Robinson says. "Why don’t we have some Black people in charge?"
She would like to see a disparity study followed by appropriate remediation programs.
A disparity study can provide documentation on specific local patterns of discrimination. Tennessee has never done one.
But local minority leaders concede that such an approach is unlikely in
the current political atmosphere, especially with a conservative
Supreme Court philosophically at odds with the concept of set-asides.
"I do think this (most recent) ruling is a wake up call," Overall says.
"It brings minorities in this country back to reality and lets them
know exactly where they stand in relationship to government
contracts....When the Supreme Court ruled the way it did, it made
people open their eyes."
Supporting Black businesses is a more constructive way to improve the
life of Black communities and the larger society than many other forms
of government spending, Robinson says.
Overall says his company is a good example of this.
"If I receive a large contract, then I would hire people from my community and train them," Overall says.
"So that takes care of some of your poverty. It takes some of your
people off welfare. And it’s a very positive cycle if it’s handled
right."
Tuesday: A look at Metro government’s minority-purchasing practices.
8/26/2005, 9:48 AM